Vision of Britain | 1951 Census: County Report

1951 Census of England and Wales, County Report (Sample Report Title: Census 1951: England and Wales: County Report: Yorkshire West Riding), Table 3 : " Acreage, Population, Private Households and Dwellings for AC, MB, UD, RD; Wards of CB, MB; CP, NT".

Show top level table	Martley	Show Worcestershire AdmC table

Click on the unit name for its home page If appears click for more detailed statistics	Acreage (Land and Inland Water) [1]	POPULATION					PRIVATE HOUSEHOLDS AND DWELLINGS, 1951
		1931	1951				Private Households [7]	Population in Private Households [8]	Structurally Separate Dwellings Occupied [9]	Rooms Occupied [10]	Density of Occupation
		Persons [2]	Persons [3]	Males [4]	Females [5]	Persons per Acre [6]	Private Households [7]	Population in Private Households [8]	Structurally Separate Dwellings Occupied [9]	Rooms Occupied [10]	Persons per Room [11]	Percentage of persons at more than 2 per Room [12]
Martley RD Total	52,838	10,664	11,443	5,603	5,840	-	3,333	-	3,280	15,579	-	-
Abberley AP/CP	2,360	525	477	243	234	-	143	-	141	672	-	-
Alfrick CP/Ch	1,648	365	420	195	225	-	125	-	124	626	-	-
Astley AP/CP	3,867	904	808	398	410	-	243	-	243	1,138	-	-
Bransford Ch/CP	1,068	236	281	144	137	-	82	-	82	424	-	-
Broadwas AP/CP	1,108	254	248	109	139	-	75	-	74	354	-	-
Clifton upon Teme Tn/CP/AP	2,976	401	414	200	214	-	126	-	125	614	-	-
Cotheridge CP/AP	2,144	219	231	113	118	-	58	-	54	320	-	-
Doddenham Ch/AP/CP	908	321	321	155	166	-	63	-	62	272	-	-
Great Witley CP/AP	2,672	359	330	162	168	-	99	-	99	525	-	-
Grimley CP/AP	2,471	562	625	301	324	-	180	-	179	837	-	-
Hillhampton Hmlt/CP	800	101	100	44	56	-	31	-	31	142	-	-
Holt Ch/AP/CP	1,999	300	364	188	176	-	106	-	105	481	-	-
Kenswick ExP/Ch/CP	425	32	21	10	11	-	7	-	7	43	-	-
Knightwick CP/Ch/AP	857	125	151	68	83	-	43	-	40	207	-	-
Leigh CP/AP	3,628	942	1,113	546	567	-	318	-	316	1,449	-	-
Little Witley CP/Ch	1,018	162	177	84	93	-	54	-	54	240	-	-
Lower Sapey AP/CP/Ch	1,696	172	185	94	91	-	51	-	51	281	-	-
Lulsley Ch/CP	843	164	153	73	80	-	41	-	40	199	-	-
Martley AP/CP	4,421	765	896	447	449	-	255	-	254	1,173	-	-
Hallow CP	3,358	1,325	1,609	766	843	-	476	-	458	2,056	-	-
Rushwick CP	2,258	594	774	376	398	-	243	-	232	1,071	-	-
Shelsley Beauchamp AP/CP	1,284	212	190	93	97	-	60	-	60	290	-	-
Shelsley Kings Hmlt/CP	1,035	261	205	109	96	-	63	-	62	301	-	-
Shelsley Walsh CP/AP	495	54	43	24	19	-	10	-	10	47	-	-
Shrawley AP/CP	1,941	434	381	184	197	-	125	-	125	580	-	-
Suckley CP/AP	2,692	537	589	304	285	-	163	-	159	746	-	-
Wichenford AP/CP/Ch	2,866	338	337	173	164	-	93	-	93	491	-	-
Pensax Ch/CP	1,197	369	320	150	170	-	88	-	88	411	-	-
Stockton on Teme CP/AP	799	115	117	55	62	-	29	-	27	141	-	-

Click on the triangles for all about a particular number.

Using data from this table, Vision of Britain can map the following rates for within Martley RD:

Rate	Date
Population Density (Persons per Acre)	1951

Notes:

The following notes to the table appeared in the original report.

1	For definitions of dwellings, households, rooms, etc., see pp. vii and xvi.
2	Acreage figures have been supplied by the Ordnance Survey Department; see p. vii.
3	All figures relate to the areas as constituted in 1951. 1931 figures are not available for those areas marked f (see p. vii).
4	Areas marked * have been created or altered during the 1931-1951 intercensal period; particulars are given either in the 1931 Census County Report, Part II, or in Table 5.

This website does not try to provide an exact replica of the original printed census tables, which often had thousands of rows and far more columns than will fit on our web pages. Instead, we let you drill down from national totals to the most detailed data available. The column headings are those that appeared in the original printed report. The numbers presented here, which are the same ones we use to create statistical maps and graphs, come from the census table and have usually been carefully checked.

The system can only hold statistics for units listed in our administrative gazetteer, so some rows from the original table may be missing. Sometimes big low-level units, like urban parishes, were divided between more than one higher-level units, like Registration sub-Districts. This is why some pages will give a higher figure for a lower-level unit: it covers the whole of the lower-level unit, not just the part within the current higher-level unit.